| </span><blockquote><span class="smallfont">Quote:</span><hr size="1" />Originally Posted by (i_am_a_n00bie,)
If I was trying to sue you, then you would be perfectly correct. The burden of proof in a court of law falls to the prosecutor. Since this is NOT a court of law, this is closer to a scientific discussion, it falls to those who wish to DISPROVE the theory, to disprove the theory.
Heh, I wonder how many times that will have to be said. Oh well.
<hr size="1" /></blockquote><span class='postcolor'>
With lost by default, this is no where near a scientific discussion, unless ofc you'd like to show us some scientific data supporting the existence of a deity. And if you want to talk scientific, then the word theory means a collective model that explains facts, fits all know data and can make accurate predictions. Since no one has yet to prove a deity exists with scientifically valid data, we can assume that no has to disprove the existence of a deity. Otherwise I'd have to start disproving the existence of flying pink elephants. |