| thats just another interpretation of the document though, just asking to what extent do these freedoms apply?
Should the constitution even be open to these kinds of interpretations though? When bush says there should be limits to freedom, he's basically saying that he sees the freedoms in the constitution as guidelines. others could see them as rules that must by respected. What do you all think? Should there be some definite guide of how to interpret the constitution that will keep it free from exploitation? |