Quote:
|
Quote by: Flip Jackson I would like to address revelation and faith next. As Prometheus said, this is the hardest topic to approach. However, I think his example is excellent. Your are extremely presumptuous here Starboy. You claim that faith alone makes all supernaturalists liars. That is far too extreme. Faith is merely belief, or in some cases belief and action. You would condemn people for their beliefs? Seems hypcritical, but whatever floats your boat. |
Now be honest. You act as if supernaturalists have only one meaning when they use the word faith. Try to have some integrity and go look the word up and take the time to examine how many supernaturalist use the word and the concept. Admittedly its uses can be confusing but that doesn't mean that they do not do exactly what I claim and do it constantly everywhere.
Quote:
|
I can't really address revelation with your definative stance against a God, so I won't try. The way you attack revelation and a higher truth sounds like a whiney teenager who can't accept that maybe his parents are right. Like Prometheus said, you can't start an argument with a claim that there is no God. If there is no proof, the idea for and against a God must be allowed.
|
In this debate I am not taking a stance for or against god. Why do so many supernaturalists have a reading comprehension problem? This is not about god. It is about the honesty of god advocates. But it is interesting that you must resort to name calling rather than actually refuting my point. Could it be you actually have nothing substantive to say?
Starboy