Quote:
| the vast majority of internet users that download mp3's through file sharing, it would be undemocratic for government allow laws to be passed against the majority of people |
So, if the majority of people wanted to kill all jews (for example), it would be undemocratic for a Government to pass legislation to prevent it? Or perhaps you only object to property rights: so how about if the vast majority of people wanted to take the land off all Jews and distribute it to non-Jews. How about speeding. The vast majority of people speed, does this make it illegal to have speeding tickets (and who cares who dies)?
Or perhaps there are rights that transcend the will of the majority -- these rights usually include some form of human rights and property rights. I seem to recall these from somewhere -- usually in places like the founding documents of every democracy in existance. If you want to argue that property rights are immoral, that's a very different argument from the one you have proposed. I'm not sure how you conceive democracy, but the picture you've painted in that statement is a rather unpleasant one.