[bugsbunny04]

</span><blockquote><span class="smallfont">Quote:</span><hr size="1" />Originally Posted by (Pooeypants,)


Your beliefs are irrelevant, the data speaks for itself. And seeing as you don't know which species we evolved from, it would seem that you've dismissed evolution without looking at the evidence. You can choose to ignore the science, but the facts will not change.

<hr size="1" /></blockquote><span class='postcolor'>

First of all, I believe I stated rather explicitly that my beliefs are not at issue so, what is your point?

Second, do you have any idea how long it has been since I was a Freshman in high school? Since then I have dedicated the space between my ears to mechanics, balistics, physics, chemistry, history and art. Pardon me if my memory of Biology 9 is not perfect, and I don't remember which primates are supposed to be closest to us whether we evolved from them or not . This is not even a debate about evolution, that debate is on the other thread. This is a debate about whether humans or primates have (relative to their height) bigger peckers. And unless your indian name means "very well endowed", I don't really see how the facts give a leg to stand on, much less a 3rd one.