Quote:
|
Quote by: MerlinsByte mb writes....I do not have a problem with evolution within the framework of the phylum, that is reptile mammal insect, etc. In fact, is a fact. I think that the myth occurs when evolution tells us that a species mutates from one phylum to another. This is over simplifying it for conciseness. |
This IS your consciousness oversimplying things. One species does not simply evolve into another phylum, that's just nonsensical. It'll need to have speciated many times before it is even consider in another group or family. Phylum is just a name for which we use to catagorise organisms, it doesn't actually exist. Now get that through your thick head before you repeat this same garbage again.
Quote:
|
Quote by: MerlinsByte Most evolutionists believe that life on earth or elsewhere arose from chemicals in the early atmosphere, and a prebotic soup of organic chemicals. I don't agree! Even if there were oceans of these organic chemicals think that today we would still have oceans of chemicals not life. Time is the problem, the 1 billion (thousand million) years are not enough time to produce the life and 3(+ - a billion or two) are not nearly enough to produce even the most simple insect. I am schooled in Evolutionary biology and I reject it.
|
You are most certainly not schooled in evolutionary biology, you are a liar and a bad one at that. You've shown already, time and time again that your grasp of the evolution theory is minimal, you can't even make the distinction between evolution by natural selection and abiogenesis, although I think it is just selective ignorance as I've told you many times over.
You've read a couple of creationist articles which have made arguments that have little relevance to evolution. Whether the first life was made by God or by natural means, it doesn't matter, evolution occurs after the first life and we know that as certainly as we know that the Earth orbits the sun. To deny otherwise is to conflict against reality.