Quote:
|
Quote by: jeffl I don't think i'm as political an animal as yourself, sb. I refer to Occam's razor because of a link posted by Asian-American that contained the following by John Bryant:
"As I pointed out in my book Systems Theory and Scientific Philosophy, science is actually a religion: Its faith involves such beliefs as that the future will be like the past in certain ways, that explanations should be based on objectively- verifiable evidence, and that the best explanation is the simplest one which fits all the facts ("the Law of Parsimony")." |
Only philosophers practice "scientific philosophy". Most scientists do not study philosophy at all. For most scientists the only philosophy course they take if any is some form of logic.
Quote:
|
It got me thinking, hence the thread.My bet is you are once again lying. The reader is refered to the consciousness thread to observe the fact that sb is more aware of names than of content.
|
What does this have to do with my claim that you do not know what Ockham's razor is? Such an answer is a good indication that I am correct. You see if you knew what it was you would be able to state it authoritatively but you do not. Could it be because yet again you think gibberish passes for knowledge?
Quote:
|
You have no idea what i presume.I can tell you i would not presume what it would be like to have perfect intellect; i'll let you handle that.Good luck with that.:)
|
Do you have a comprehension problem like Merlin? Notice the question marks in my sentences? Questions are not presumptions. But my guess is that you do not respond in a strait forward manner because if you did it would be made obvious that yet again you to not have the slightest notion of what you are talking about. But there is one big tip off as to your lack of intellectual honesty. The fact that you will not admit ignorance is a very big tip-off.
Starboy