Quote:
|
Hawking went on, the only conceivable way of life on earth forming as it did within a realistic probability, relative to the Big Bang, would be if the Universe were not only expanding, but accelerating, which at the time of his writing, no one was suggesting.
|
Hawking who sits in the same chair that Newton did is one of my heroes as is Einstein.
The universe is accelerating because there is not enough mass (the so called missing mass) and some other unknown force. I love astronomy and cosmology. Now, If hawking is saying that the accelerating universe has bestowed more time for evolutionary theory, then he is agreeing with me that there isn't enough time for life to form, without some major modifications to the fraudulent theory of evolution.
More time would be the only way that I would even give a half nod of approval to evolutionary theory as it is written. Great minds think alike, I didn't know I was in such esteemed company thanks Stephen!
mb
I happen to agree with some aspects of evolutionary biology. Mr. phooey jumps to conclusions such as that I reject all science.
I happen to question the gaps in evolutionary biology such as the gap from when the first non organic chemicals became organic (carbon based then nitrogenized) then...jump a huge gap where the organic chemicals combined to form RNA and DNA etc then leaped to replicating proto life such as virus and the 1000x bigger bacteria. I reject the idea that bacteria morphed into photosynthesizing plant cells then to sexually dividing cells then to these cells morphing into an aquatic multi celled creature, then the the flight of fantasy when this morphed into an amphibian then to a lungfish to a reptile to a dinosaur to a bird or reptile to a human.
Man, are these scientists sampling LSD when writing this swill? Its worse than ignorant to believe this BS...Excuse me, pooey learn to think for yourself and snap out of that denial, ....My tolerance for your self imposed ignorance isn't my forte.
mb
Oh and one more thing for those of you that do not agree that Abiogenesis is an interregnal part of biological evolutionary theory read on
excerpt from ; Biology Cabinet Organization/ scientific research and education on Biology
"Many creationists insist on separate the process of Abiogenesis from the process of Evolution; however, THEY ARE ABSOLUTELY WRONG.
Abiogenesis is the origin of evolution. (emphasis mine)
Evolution always occurs at a molecular level and it is manifested at a macroscopic level of any given biosystem. Since the process of Abiogenesis was the beginning of a purely-chemical evolution of biomolecules and life is merely a quantum state of matter, we can provide, without a bit of doubt, evidence on the fact that Abiogenesis was the starting point in the Evolution of those molecular structures grouped as living beings."
http://www.biocab.org/Origin_of_Life.html