There is a place to teach religious mythology. It's called church. There's also a place to teach science. It's called a science class. It's all well and good to believe in a non-scientific mythology (I have a few such beliefs myself), but to say that it is somehow has the same impartial credibility as evolution, just doesn't hold water.
As far as "Christian Science" goes, there are a great many christians who have a scientific education, and have no trouble integrating the study of evolution into their beliefs. In fact, MOST "Creationists" are actually "Theistic Evolutionists," believing that the hand of "god" is what drives and directs the scientifically observable facts of evolution.
Amongst the "common folk" of the US, the statistics of belief break down something like this...
Creationists - 44%
Theistic Evolutionists - 39%
Natualistic Evolutionists - 10%
Other - 07%
However, among "scientists," the breakdown is significantly different...
Creationists - 05%
Theistic Evolutionists - 40%
Natualistic Evolutionists - 55%
"The "scientist" group would presumably include biologists and geologists. But it would also include persons with professional degrees in fields unrelated to evolution, such as computer science, chemical engineering, physics, etc."
http://www.religioustolerance.org/ev_publi.htm
All that one has to do is to realize that the majority of religious creation myths where written in ancinet times, and with an ancient's understanding of the world around them. And, "pure" mythlogical creationism has no more credibility than "the earth is flat," or "the sun revolves around the earth," or that dark skinned people are that way because they are "cursed with the mark of Ham." It is only the most radical fringe of religious zealots that advance the purely mythological version of the origin of our species. It is completely possible to be a rational person, driven by reason AND faith.
I know I am.
percivale