[shunyadragon]

</span><blockquote><span class="smallfont">Quote:</span><hr size="1" />Originally Posted by (Matthew Cromer,)
What are we supposed to debate here?

The fact that some kind of evolution and speciation occurs and is the origin of the life we see, or whether the neo darwinian synthesis is in itself an adequate explanation for the evolution and speciation we see?

I don't expect there is going to be much of interest in talking about "Creation Science" which is not compatible with science.<hr size="1" /></blockquote><span class='postcolor'>

'Creation Science' is the main opposing view to evolution in the debate. Those that believe in 'Creation Science' believe it is a science.

The issue whether God created existence in the way scientists generally see the universe evolving from some point billions of years ago in time we now call the 'Big Bang' or these events occured without the 'Divine Cause' is a side issue, but the substance for a debate is weak, because the origins are largely unknown. It is simply issue of belief.