[shunyadragon]

</span><blockquote><span class="smallfont">Quote:</span><hr size="1" />Originally Posted by (PeterAngelo,)
At least it is somethig tangible (if invisible) god is just imagination.

makeshiftpatriot has it right( and it is a pleasure to read good writing).

I did not mean to give the eye any meaning other than a poetic one.
The "eye" as the proof of the intention of creation is a sweet thought - but very egocentric.

Random nothing is easier to swallow.<hr size="1" /></blockquote><span class='postcolor'>

Actually scientist consider gravity only tangible in effects. Those that believe in God consider God tangible in effects.

Far more is known today about the progressive development of organs from simple forms to the complex, like the eye, for this to be significant issue. The 'too complex' view of 'Creation Science' advocates is an example of how far behind they are in light of today's knowledge of evolution.

I do notice that our friends of the 'Creation Science' persuasion are silent lately and have not responded to the posts from the evolution advocates. I know jpapadpapa is having a baby, but I don't think that is reason fogus is not responding.