View Single Post
Old Feb 12, 2004, 06:12 pm   #1 (permalink) (top)
Deckard59
Sedimentary Rock
 
Posts: 2
Since it's now obvious to everyone in the United States, although the rest of the world knew before the war started, that there was never W. of Mass Destruction in Iraq, the question remains, what right did the United States have to attack Iraq.

True, Iraq didn’t meet all the requests of the Weapons Inspectors, but there was nothing to find. Iraq’s objections and lack of cooperation was somewhat within reason, especially now, when we can clearly see that Bush and the rest of the hawks were just using the United Nations.

Some do see the truth as to what happened, but still many fellow Americans feel they can pat themselves in the back because of all the horrific murders and human rights violations that they’ve uncovered and stopped. They feel that if the US didn’t go, those things would still be continuing today. That point maybe true, but in no way does that give a country the right to attack another country. All though not on the same scale, every country in the world is guilty of human rights violations, even the US.

When anyone looks now, it’s obvious to see that the United States only motive in attacking Iraq was because of Greed, Money and Power.

Without any legitimate reasons, it’s clear that the leader of such an aggressive war mongering country should be up for war crimes.
Deckard59 is offline   Reply With Quote