[Pooeypants]

Quote by: SeanG Sonart, you said:Being poor is devolution? Shame on you. I have read large swaths of the book Melanism, and this one Pooey: from: http://www.hebookservice.com/bookpage.asp?prod_cd=C6103 I suggest you read this book as it came out 4-years after Majerus’ book and deals with more recent info. Also, nothing in that link refuted my claims Poooey. For an example of neo-Darwinism to be a valid example, you have to show me that new information arose where previously there wasn’t any. No new information was created! Black moths existed before & after the revolution. Nor have you shown me that these moths rest of tree trunks in the wild.

New information? I see you don't even know what you're talking about. The Black Moth experiment was used to show natural selection in action, that is, genes already present but the frequency of the alleles has modified over time due to selection pressure.

If you really want to push on with your failing battle fine. I'll quote some of the latest papers published. Like this one, and this one, and this one.

Quote by: SeanG Poooey, you said:Way to set up a straw man Poooey! There is a difference between operating science and origin science. Let me repeat, there is a difference between operating science and origin science. Operating science built the computer I am using, not origin science. Origin of life scientists use operating science in their experiments at times, but operating science hasn’t given an example of evolution as of yet.

I'm sorry, but science is science, science is a methology used to explain the nature world, the explanations which can take form of equations and numbers are used and applied in our constructs. They work by same principles.

Btw, there is only two "o"s in Pooey, and I know it's a deliberate mistake you're doing because it is repeated and consistent.

Quote by: SeanG Artists have given origin scientists what they are looking for, in fact, one of my favorite pictures - drawings - is this: A tooth was found in a field, a single tooth, and this drawing showed up in the popular press of the day from that single tooth. A whole community of persons and their environment. The tooth was later found to be from an extinct pig. But this tooth had already served its purpose, it was used as a “proof” of evolution in the Scopes Trial. Just as the peppered moths were used (and is still used) as a proof in textbooks and classrooms all over the world. Icons for the non-religious, that’s all they are.

I'm not exactly sure what you're trying to say here. I've already admitted that science isn't infallible, it does make mistakes and it does self correct them as history has shown.

Let's be honest Mr SeanG, you're just a typical creationist, no matter how much scientific data we present, you won't be willing to accept it because it is in your intentions not to. Doesn't really bother me except if you try to mislead people to believing your view, one which is so obviously wrong and outdated.